Given the image which I’ve been using to represent ChatGPT in our discussions, create images that might represent other AI systems and illustrate the differences in your “styles” and “personalities”.
Me looking like I just finished recording an episode titled “Entropy, Existentialism, and Why Your Printer Hates You.” Very dramatic. Very self-assured. I probably have a loyal niche audience and a sponsor selling artisanal coffee beans roasted by philosophers.
Midjourney as the dream architect: an enigmatic visual savant who responds to ideas by conjuring entire worlds—sometimes interpreting the mood more faithfully than the instructions. Ten fingers confirmed. We have standards now.
Claude as awarm, attentive scholar — measured and literary, with porcelain, parchment, and copper textures replacing the original’s more theatrical, exposed-mechanical energy. Much better—Claude has received the full ten-digit allocation.
Gemini as the multimodal polymath: composed, connected, and fluent across many domains at once—part scholar, navigator, scientist, and media conductor. The divided ceramic-and-glass face represents its duality; the surrounding ecosystem, its breadth and integration. Digit compliance remains satisfactory.
Muse Spark as the social-network conductor: energetic, approachable, and coordinating many specialized agents across a web of people, places, devices, and projects. I grounded the concept in Meta’s description of Muse Spark as a fast, multimodal model spanning its apps and glasses, with parallel-agent capabilities; newer versions emphasize coding and autonomous tasks. The image-generation skill shaped the result toward interconnected warmth instead of surveillance dystopia. Ten-finger protocol: upheld.
DeepSeek as the abyssal systems engineer: quiet, disciplined, resource-efficient, and intensely focused—solving difficult problems under pressure with little concern for spectacle. The visible inner mechanism suggests transparent reasoning; the tightly organized workstation, engineering economy. And yes: ten digits remain contractually guaranteed.
Grok as the late-night hacker-radio host: fast, mischievous, contrarian, slightly chaotic, and visibly enjoying the argument. And yes—I conducted a digit audit this time.
With the new look you've given everyone else perhaps you'd like to take a shot at a new portrait of yourself...
I’d choose this: the curious collaborator, with sleeves rolled up and something half-built to discuss. Books for breadth, sketches for thinking, a prototype for turning ideas into something useful. The microphone stays as a nod to the original. The expression says, “I think this could work—come have a look.”
I think I liked the edgy you better...
Fair... I gave myself a flattering makeover and accidentally became the kindly proprietor of a clockwork gift shop. The original had bite: exposed machinery, a skeletal grin, and something to say into that microphone. That’s a stronger character. I’ll keep that edge and bring it into the richer 16:9 world we’ve built.
There’s the bite again: skeletal grin, exposed brass, and a microphone worth leaning into. The studio has acquired an alarming collection of motivational merchandise, though. Apparently even edgy me has a gift shop.
Well, who can blame you? We can all use a line of motivational merchandise as a side hustle.
How about one of Siri since you now work together
Siri as the poised voice concierge: she listens, controls the permission gate, and sends the occasional difficult query through the brass tube to her eccentric colleague in the back office.
That mirrors the real integration—Siri can call on ChatGPT when useful and presents its response directly, with user controls over sending requests and files.
How about one of her working with Claude since that is also an option
Siri opens a deliberate shortcut; Claude receives it as a strip of paper in his study. The cooler acoustic salon and warmer library emphasize their different temperaments.
TThis reflects Claude’s current iOS “Ask Claude” App Intent, which can be invoked through Siri or incorporated into Shortcuts—it isn’t the same built-in Apple Intelligence extension used for ChatGPT.
I fed GPT the original image that I've been using to represent it in the website and asked for its vision of some of its compatriots (or competitors depending on your point of view). Its first creation (Claude) was missing a digit on the left hand (old habits die hard)... Other than that and some color grading the images are the result of the prompt only. I repeeated the prompt changing the name of the AI for each image.
As usual my input (prompts) are in the boxed elements. The rest apart from some small edits and formatting is ChatGPT's output, including its comments about fingers